Wisp Unification Theory - 5 Gravity

Page last updated 14-Feb-2005

This page contains the complete chapter. To download the new 2011 2nd edition of wisp unification theory go to the homepage.



Gravity is a phenomenon associated with the gravitational force acting on any object that has mass and is situated within the Earth’s gravitational field. But what causes it?
Newton was the first of the great scientists who had insight into its true cause, although he never formalised proof of his idea. His law of gravitation deals only with the dynamics of the problem, not its cause.
We shall see that wisp theory’s explanation of the cause of gravity is similar to Newton’s thoughts. And using the concept of ‘zero-state space’ reveals that objects are ‘pushed down’ towards the Earth, not ‘pulled down’.
Einstein was also correct in saying that the curvature of space causes the gravitational effect. It is the curvature of wisp space that creates the radial compression force, which ‘pushes down’ on objects.

5.1 The weakest force
Of the four fundamental forces of nature – the gravitational force, the electromagnetic force and the strong and weak nuclear forces – gravity is the odd one out, and by far the weakest. Physicists have been unable to integrate it successfully into their theories.
The ratio of the strength of the gravitational force to the electrical force between two electrons, is the same as the ratio of the size of an atom’s nucleus to that of the entire universe. The gravitational force is so incredibly weak that it almost ceases to exist, and yet, its effect spans the entire universe; and will one day determine its fate.
For two electrons, the ratio of gravitational to electrical force is:

We only feel the effect of gravity on the surface of the Earth, because the gravity of the whole mass of the Earth – 6×10^24 kg – is acting on us.
We are fortunate that most of the positive and negative electric charges are neutralised within atoms, so we do not experience their true power; if we did, we would be subjected to enormously powerful electromagnetic force effects.

5.2 Current theories
The two theories that best explain gravity are Newton’s law of gravitation and Einstein’s general theory of relativity:

5.2.1 Newton’s law of gravitation
This states that the gravitational force of attraction F between any two masses m1 and m2 , whose centres are separated by a distance d, is given by the equation

where G is the gravitational constant, which is a measure of the strength of the gravitational force between two bodies and is usually regarded as a universal constant.
Newton’s theory is simple and easy to understand. He introduced the concept that gravitational force is ‘action at a distance’, and so avoided having to explain how it propagates through space.

5.2.2 Einstein’s general theory of relativity
This is a complex theory, and applies to frames of reference that are accelerating with respect to inertial frames. It builds on the principle of equivalence: No experiment can distinguish between a uniform gravitational field and an equivalent uniform acceleration.
Tests carried out to an accuracy greater than one part in a hundred million million have shown that there is nothing to distinguish between gravitational and inertial mass.
The theory predicts that mass and energy are responsible for the curvature of space–time, and gravitational effects are a consequence of this. The gravitational ‘force’ in this sense is regarded as fictitious.
In this space–time, light and material bodies follow paths of shortest distance between points – geodesic lines. The rules of Euclidean geometry breakdown – straight-line paths become curved; angles of a triangle add to more than 180°; and the ratio of the circumference to the diameter of a circle is less than pi.

Figure 5.1 shows a simplified model: a heavy mass (lead ball) curving two-dimensional space–time (rubber-sheet). This image helps us to understand the process that causes the gravitational effect. However, it only represents two-dimensional space–time which we view in three-dimensional space. It is difficult to visualise what three-dimensional space–time would look like.
The first success of Einstein’s theory was demonstrated by the correct prediction of a small anomaly in the precession of the perihelion of the planet Mercury – that Newton’s formula failed to predict – of 43 seconds of arc per century.
Further tests confirm general relativity. In 1919 Arthur Eddington carried out tests during a total solar eclipse and showed that light gets deflected as it passes close to the surface of the Sun.
If Einstein’s general theory is the true explanation for the cause of gravity, then it should be able to unify with quantum theory. But it cannot, so some doubt remains as to whether general relativity is wholly correct.
Its predictions are indeed remarkable. And many ideas from Einstein’s theories are used in wisp theory – the main exception being the joining of space and time.

5.2.3 Other theories
The standard model does not incorporate a theory of gravity, as it proves too difficult to unify.
For gravity to be consistent with quantum and string theories, a force particle called the graviton is predicted. It is thought to be responsible for carrying force during gravitational interaction. It is predicted to have zero rest mass and travel at the speed of light. However, there is no proof that gravitons exist; their existence is only a theoretical assumption.

The graviton theory suggests that these particles emit from matter. Figure 5.2 shows gravitons radiating from particle P, and passing through area’s A and B. The density of gravitons in area B has been reduced by a factor of 4, since area B is twice the distance from particle P than is area A. As they radiate into space their intensity diminishes inversely proportional to the square of the distance from P.
This is similar to Newton’s law of gravitation, in that the magnitude of the force varies inversely proportional to the square of the distance d – inverse-square law.

5.3 Wisp theory of gravitation
The gravitational force experience by matter is caused by its central zero-state space interacting with radial compression forces in curved wisp space. We will develop this idea in stages during this section.
Einstein’s general relativity says that the curvature of space–time causes the gravitational effect. But in wisp theory, space and time are not joined together and so time has no affect on curved wisp space.

5.3.1 Curved wisp space
Spherical matter-fractals force the surrounding wisp space to adopt spherical symmetry or circular curvature. This forces wisps apart, stretching their ‘nuclear springs’, which creates tension force. The greater the curvature, the larger the gaps, and the greater the energy stored in curved wisp space.
Wisp space bends more acutely near matter, creating larger gaps, and becomes rarer as a result. At greater distances the effect is reduced and wisp space becomes denser, approach that of ‘flat space’ – see section 2.2 (Face-centred cubic lattice).
Wisp space’s super-fine structure supports the principle of superposition, whereby small individual effects of curvature due to many matter-fractals are superimposed or added to give greater curvature effect. Therefore curvature is proportional to the mass of a body.

5.3.2 Tension and compression forces
There are two types of force produced by curved wisp space: spherical tension force and radial compression force.
Spherical tension forces are produced when wisp space curves around a body (Figure 5.3). The forces equalise within spherical shells that surround the body. And result because the presence of matter-fractals within the body break the symmetry of flat one-state space, stretching it into spherical shells. Spherical tension forces remain perpendicular to radial lines projected from the body’s centre of mass P.

The effects of many spherical tension shells squeezing their enclosed wisp space, produce the radial compression forces. Circular symmetry focuses these towards the body’s centre of mass. And symmetry ensures that even though the spherical tension forces create the radial compression forces, the two remain orthogonal and have no component parts in each other’s direction.
We examine the structure of the forces in more detail. Figure 5.4a shows three wisps in flat wisp space. Their density is at maximum and strong nuclear forces bind them together. There is no resultant force as radial compression forces are absent, and any tension forces present cancel out.

Figure 5.4b shows spherical tension forces in curved wisp space. They follow the lines of curvature in wisp space and link together forming closed loops of equalised tension – they form the contour lines of a conservative field.
Figure 5.4c shows the radial compression force. Here wisp B plays a key role in force distribution, by coupling the forces from particles C, D, E and F, on to particle A, one large force is created from four smaller ones. An important aspect of this coupling process is that it directs the force along radial lines to underlying wisps and so strengthens the orthogonal relationship between the two force types.
We could reverse the force arrows in the figure to show a large opposing force splitting into four smaller ones. These smaller forces would further reduce, spreading their effect uniformly throughout wisp space.
The radial compression force is created when matter distorts flat wisp space. It is this force that is responsible for the gravitational effect.
The force that joins wisps together is the powerful nuclear binding force. Curvature separates wisps by distances that would normally be considered too small to be of any importance. But the powerful nuclear force magnifies these tiny separations, enabling gravitational effects to be readily observed.
If we compare these to spring forces that obey Robert Hooke’s law, then the value of spring stiffness would be extremely large. As a consequence wisp space is very stiff. Small curvature produces large gravitational effects, and larger curvature produces enormously powerful gravitational effects.
The forces in the spring model and in wisp space vary according to the inverse-square law, in agreement with Newton’s law of gravitation.

5.3.3 Force and the inverse-square law
A model showing springs connected to junction plates can be used to simulate curved wisp space (Figure 5.5).

Consider the forces within a volume segment projected radially from the surface of a body at point P. This volume is filled with springs and identically sized junction plates. The plate boundaries are fixed at double radius increments, i.e. 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16. A single spring connects to the centre on one side of the plate and four identical springs connect to the corners on the other side.
When placed under tension, the junction plates line up forming spherical shells and the forces in the springs obey the inverse-square law – doubling the distance from point P reduces the spring’s force by a factor of four. The sum total of forces on the inside of the outer shell is equal in magnitude to the single force T acting on P. The effects of the force at P are therefore spread uniformly through the volume segment.
The springs in this example are being stretched, creating tension. But equally, if the springs were compressed, they would still obey the inverse-square law.
Now, comparing this spring model to curved wisp space. Imagine spherical tension shells (junction plates) compressing the nuclear wisp springs that lie along the radial lines. The force in the springs increases according to the inverse-square law, and it is this force that is responsible for the gravitational effect.
A small amount of energy is used in establishing forces in curved wisp space – the principle of least action. This restores the order of symmetry from one of disruption – caused by matter’s presence – to that of circular symmetry. The energy is stored in curved wisp space as gravitational potential energy.
In reality the distribution of spherical tension shells would be continuous around P, and the splitting of forces would be smoothed out and not restricted to specific shells. Wisp space gets stretched, but remains in a state of static equilibrium.
Now, consider what would happen if the body were suddenly removed. Wisp space would rush in and restore symmetry to that of flat wisp space.
If on the other hand we remove a thin layer of wisp space surrounding the body – effectively isolating it – then it would be unable to exert or feel any external force.
So we can conclude that the force responsible for the gravitational effect comes from the surrounding curved wisp space and that it does not emanate from the within the body.

5.3.4 Why obey the inverse-square law?
Forces do not have to obey this law; it depends on their environment. For example, if we lived in a two-dimensional flat plane, wisps would bend around ‘flat’ matter-fractals, following circular lines. And since wisp gap size is proportional to the curvature of the arc of a circle; and one arc is all that is needed for two-dimensional space, the radial compression force would be proportional to the inverse of the circle’s radius 1/r, and not its inverse squared.
For a spherical matter-fractal in three-dimensional space, two arcs are required to represent curvature (curved surface area of a sphere). And wisp gap size is obtained by multiplying the curvature of two arcs. So the radial compression force is proportional to the inverse of the radius squared, 1/r × 1/r.
If four-dimensional space did exist, then curvature would be obtained by multiplying the curvature of three arcs. And the force would obey an inverse cube law.
In fact, curvature has one dimension less that the space in which it exists. Space has only three dimensions, and so radial compression forces must obey the inverse-square law.
We have taken the first step in developing our gravitation theory by clearly showing that forces in curved wisp space obey the inverse-square law. But this wisp space is in a state of equilibrium, and we have yet to show what effect this has on other matter-fractals placed in it.
Before going further, let us stop to reflect on Newton’s thoughts as to the cause of gravity.

5.3.5 Newton’s thoughts
Newton published his mathematical work on gravity in his book Principia Mathematica in 1687.
It was not necessary for Newton to know the cause of gravity in order to develop mathematical laws describing its behaviour. But later, when he published his treatise Opticks in 1704, he gave insight as to what he thought caused gravity.
I believe Newton’s thoughts are correct and with the addition of an interaction with matter-fractal’s zero-state space, the cause of the gravity is revealed.

Sir Isaac Newton © Kim Albinson

In Query 21, Newton wrote on the subject of an ethereal medium link with gravity.

  • Is not this Medium much rarer within the dense Bodies of the Sun, Stars, Planets and Comets, than in the empty celestial Spaces between them? And in passing from them to great distances, doth it not grow denser and denser perpetually, and thereby cause the gravity of those great Bodies towards one another, and of their parts towards the Bodies; every Body endeavouring to go from the denser parts of the Medium towards the rarer?

In wisp space the gaps near bodies are greater than those further from them. So wisp theory confirms Newton’s thoughts as to the cause of gravitation, in that wisp space is rarer near bodies and denser further away.
Even though the density variation is so small as to be almost non-existent – similar to our comparison of the size of an atom’s nucleus to that of the universe, its size is magnified by the strong nuclear force, producing a macroscopic gravitational effect.
But there is something missing! We cannot produce the effects of gravitation from density variation alone (Newton knew this). Matter placed in these fields would experience a force that would be due to the difference in density across its surface. And the resultant force would be proportional to the inverse cube of the separation distance. So we cannot use this concept as it stands, as we know the gravitational force varies as the inverse square of the distance.

5.3.6 Wisp gravitational force
A spherical matter-fractal surrounding its zero-state sphere is placed in curved wisp space (Figure 5.6). Spherical tension and radial compression forces pass through the fractal’s layers, but cannot pass through its ‘empty’ zero-state sphere. The effect of the ‘horizontal’ spherical tension forces cancel out by symmetry – equal and opposite forces – and are not shown for clarity.

What happens when the radial compression force presses down upon the matter-fractal?
Without rigid support from the fractal’s binding force, its ‘empty’ zero-state sphere would simply collapse, filling with wisps from curved space – wisp space always tries to restore its order of symmetry.
But this does not happen, because the strong nuclear binding force rigidly locks the fractal’s wisps around its ‘empty’ zero-state sphere, preventing its collapse.
The radial compression force pushing down on the upper surface of the matter-fractal’s zero-state sphere causes the gravitational effect. The lower surface of the sphere cannot generate an opposing force, because force cannot pass through ‘empty’ zero-state space. The radial compression force is unopposed and is distributed on to the fractal’s wisps. This causes the matter-fractal to accelerate downwards towards P.
As the zero-state sphere moves towards P, wisps on its lower hemisphere are displaced outwards at right angles to its direction of motion, and close back in forming a new layer on its upper hemisphere.
Directly beneath the matter-fractal, a tiny ‘shadow’ forms, because the downward acting force cannot pass through its zero-state sphere. However, the chances of lower lying matter-fractals being caught in this ‘shadow’ are negligible. As the size of a matter-fractal’s zero-state sphere is extremely small compared to the diameter of an atom and the shadow is likely to have a short range.

5.3.7 Zero-state space shock waves
Along diagonal paths taken by high-speed particles, small shock waves form as radial compression forces collapse the wisp space in their wakes (Figure 5.7).

Matter-fractals that move horizontally through wisp space do so along lines of equalised tension T, and consequently do not produce shock waves. This is because the displaced wisps move horizontally around their zero-state spheres maintaining constant tension.
Vertical motions of zero-state spheres do not produce shock waves either, because the radial compression force at the top of the spheres never meets up with the wisps beneath, as they are constantly blocked by presence of zero-state space.
Only motions along diagonal lines through curved wisp space produce shock waves. These occur because the radial compression force collapses the wisp space in the wake of the matter-fractal’s fast-moving zero-state sphere. The radial compression force pushes the upper part of the collapsing wisp space into the lower part, knocking them together creating small shock waves.
Fast-moving meteors descending diagonally towards the Earth will produce small shock waves, which make contact with the Earth’s surface directly beneath their paths. The shock waves are longitudinal pressure waves that travel through wisp space at a speed of possibly ten times that of light.

5.3.8 Calculating gravitational acceleration
The radial compression force forms a vector field and its lines appear to arise from infinity and terminate on any mass that can be regarded as the source of the field.
At any point in curved wisp space the radial compression force Fr varies proportionally to the mass of the source M, and inversely to the square of the distance r from it. As shown by the equation

Spherical tension force produces the radial compression force that acts on wisps, creating a downward radial compression vector pressure Pr. Curved wisp space is unique in that it creates vector pressure (having both magnitude and direction), unlike in liquids and gases where pressure is scalar (having magnitude only, which acts equally in all directions).
Wisp space remains in static equilibrium, since equal and opposite forces prevent wisp movements. Its wisps can be compared to bricks in the wall of a tall building – they too can support huge pressures without moving.
Imagine a matter-fractal with a solid centre being placed in curved wisp space. Equal and opposite forces would pass through it, and it would remain stationary. Its fractal shape would slightly distort under pressure, but unless this was extreme (as around a black hole), the effect would be negligible and can be ignored. However, we will discuss this effect later – (Sections 5.6 Pioneers’ orbital discrepancies and 11.3.4 Star speeds in rotating galaxies).
Now what happens when bricks are removed from the wall of our fictitious building, creating a hole?
Prior to its collapse, the bricks at the base of the hole had no pressure pushing down on them, whereas the bricks at the top of the hole were under enormous pressure and began to crack. The wall collapses and bricks from above fall into the hole.
Now consider what happens to our solid matter-fractal when its middle is removed – creating a real matter-fractal complete with its zero-state sphere (Figure 5.8)?

In curved wisp space it behaves in a similar way to the hole in the wall, except that its structure does not collapse. Wisps lying at the base of its zero-state sphere have no pressure pushing down on them, while those on the upper surface experience pressure from the radial compression force.
Gravitational acceleration calculations are shown in Equation set 5.1. The centre of the matter-fractal is located at the x-y origin. We carry out an integral that sums the effect of the radial vector pressure over the upper zero-state hemisphere’s surface to get the total force acting on the matter-fractal, which is its gravitational force. If we then divide this by the matter-fractal’s mass we obtain its gravitational acceleration.

We have to introduce a new constant W, which is similar to the gravitational constant G – it has the same numerical value but different units.
This model accurately predicts gravitational acceleration for matter-fractals – fundamental particles – of any size. On the surface of the Earth its value is 9.8 m/per sec per sec. However, there is one important condition imposed:

  • The masses of the matter-fractals must be proportional to the surface area of their zero-state spheres, i.e. the square of their radii, b.

If the masses of the matter-fractals were to vary in the conventionally manner – as the cube of their radii – then the equivalence principle established by Einstein would be violated. However, if a number of atoms made from these matter-fractals were assembled together to make a large homogeneous isotropic body, then the mass of that body would be proportional to the cube of its radius as expected.
Physicists have carried out tests to an accuracy of 1 part in 10^14 and shown that there is no detectable difference in the inertial and gravitational mass for different substances. To detect a difference using modern methods the zero-state radius would need to be at least one hundred times larger than an atom. The formula shows that for zero-state radii on subatomic scale, the difference in acceleration between different sized particles is far too small to be detected at present.
So far, we have dealt with the gravitational effect of a matter-fractal in curved wisp space. It should be noted, however, that the matter-fractal would also superimpose its curvature of wisp space on the body P, resulting in both bodies accelerating towards each other with equal and opposite forces.
We have not included any relativistic effects in gravity, so as to avoid over-complicating matters.

5.3.9 Bending light
The curvature of wisp space by matter or energy will affect the path of light. Light is a pattern of oscillating transverse wisp waves, which lack zero-state spheres. Even though they do not possess zero-state spheres they are affected by gravitational force, and their paths will follow the curvature of wisp space.

5.4 Podkletnov’s experiments

5.4.1 Gravity shielding
There have been some very interesting developments with experiments concerning gravity shielding.
In September 1996 a report of an experiment performed by Eugene Podkletnov was about to be published by the Institute of Physics, London, in their Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, but was suddenly withdrawn by Podkletnov. Possibly because commercial backers wanted the discovery kept secret or the Tampere University of Technology in Finland, where he worked, feared loss of credibility. Whatever the reason is, doubt still remains as to whether this discovery is genuine.
Scientists at the University claimed they had discovered by accident a gravity shielding effect, while carrying out routine research work on superconductivity. They discovered that objects suspended above a cryostat containing a spinning superconductor disc could lose up to 2 per cent of their weight (Figure 5.9). The effect penetrated the floor above the laboratory, but not beneath the device.

The scientists used a spinning ceramic superconductor toroidal disc of composite structure – 275 mm across and 10 mm thick – suspended in a magnetic field and enclosed in a low-temperature container called a cryostat. Liquid nitrogen and liquid helium vapours were used to cool the disc to around 40 K. The upper layer of the disc became superconducting, whilst the lower layer stayed resistive. High-frequency currents were applied to the solenoids causing the disc to lift and rotate.
On first hearing about the experiment, I thought it plausible that such an effect could occur if wisp space were made to rotate at high-speed. And it would only be a matter of time before further news on the subject followed.
The mass of the Earth curves wisp space slightly, and this creates the gravitational force. But when wisp space rotates, centripetal forces stretch the horizontal spherical tension forces moving the wisps further apart. This reduces the curvature and hence the gravitational effect.
Since the disc is small and the curvature of wisp space at the Earth’s surface is very small, we can compare the rotation effect to that of bob weights on a spinning governor. They move outward as rotation speed increases and this reduces curvature. The reduction in gravity is related to the disc’s size and its rotation speed. And somehow, the high-frequency electromagnetic fields generated by the device interact with the disc’s crystal structure causing wisp space to rotate. The spinning motion of the disc magnifies the effect.
Scientists are having great difficulty in trying to repeat this experiment because of secrecy of information. The difficult part is possibly trying to get wisp space to rotate.
Ron Koczor, head of a group at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama, has invested $600,000 in building a replica of Podkletnov’s apparatus. Hopefully they will get a positive result soon.
Boeing, the world’s largest aircraft manufacturer, is also interested in the work. Their researchers in Seattle are trying to develop gravity propulsion devices.
If results prove positive, then the effects produced by these small devices would violate Einstein’s general theory of relativity.

5.4.2 Impulse gravity generator
In an article published in New Scientist, 12 January 2002, Podkletnov claimed to have made a device that produces a pulse that has the same properties as a gravitational field. The pulse can pass through a steel plate and knock over a book placed on a table one-kilometre away.
Wisp theory predicts this effect is also possible, simply by rotating wisp space horizontally instead of vertically.

Figure 5.10 shows the horizontal beam acting on a matter-fractal placed in its path. Centripetal forces that develop in the rotating beam cause its wisps to move outwards, reducing the beam’s density. Earth’s spherical tension force pulls horizontally on one side of matter-fractal’s zero-state sphere, but the ‘equal and opposite’ tension force pulling on the other side is reduced because the beam’s density is lower. This causes a net force to act on the zero-state sphere, which causes the matter-fractal to repel from the beam’s source. This explains why the book experienced a repulsive impulse force, causing it to fall over.
Some of the beam’s energy will be absorbed by the steel plate and air particles in its path. But the magnitude of force exerted by a horizontal beam would be much greater than that force cause by a vertical beam.
Again, secrecy shrouds the experiment and it has not been verified. But, wisp theory predicts that if the original gravity ‘shielding’ effect is possible, then the impulse beam effect is also possible. It is possibly the original ‘vertically operated’ device, modified and placed on its side, projecting a horizontal beam.
The commercial potential for the impulse beam would be vast, explaining why both NASA and Boeing are taking these reports seriously.

5.5 Quantum gravitational effects
We have looked closely at the gravitational effects that take place at the centres of the fundamental particles. The gravitational effect arises from the radial compression force causing pressure to act on matter-fractal’s zero-state upper hemisphere.
Quantum theory is amazingly successful and adapts perfectly to the structure of wisp space. Wisp space’s transverse waves cause the wave patterns of quantum theory.
Quantum mechanics does fully explain the behaviour of a particle’s bound states in a gravitational field. But I do not believe it is necessary to explain gravity in terms of quantum theory’s force particle – the graviton. And it is not necessary to use the theory to explain the cause of gravity.

5.6 Pioneers’ orbital discrepancies
The first spacecraft to explore the planets in the outer solar system were the Pioneers 10 and 11, launched in 1972 and 1973 respectively. After successfully completing their missions they drifted out of the solar system in opposite directions, journeying on towards the stars.
John Anderson and other scientists at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory have discovered that an unexpected tiny deceleration force (less than a nanometre per second per second) has affected both spacecraft.
According to Newton’s law of gravitation, only the weakening gravitational pull from the receding Sun should slow them down. But Pioneer 10’s position is some 400,000 km behind schedule, indicating that an additional decelerating force has affected it.
Wisp theory predicts an additional tiny deceleration force directed towards the Sun. This occurs because curvature reduces the density of wisp space. At a greater distance from the Sun, wisp space is denser – closer to one-state space.

Figures 5.11 shows the effect this has on a matter-fractal’s structure. As it moves away from the Sun, it experiences the expected Newtonian gravitational force – due to the radial compression force. But variation in the density of curved wisp space causes the fractal’s shape to distort (Figure 5.11a), becoming larger in the rarer space facing the Sun. The figure’s pear-shaped distortion has been greatly exaggerated to show this effect. The fractal’s binding force acts to restore spherical symmetry and in doing so creates opposing push–pull forces in the surrounding wisp space (Figure 5.11b). Both the Newtonian gravitational force and the additional retarding force act in the same direction – towards the Sun.

5.7 Gravity Probe B
NASA are planning to launch the Gravity Probe B spacecraft to test two as-yet untested predictions of Einstein’s general theory of relativity. It will test for the effect of frame dragging – space dragged around by the Earth’s rotation – and geodetic precession.
The experiment will use four small, incredibly precise gyroscopes to help detect the small relativistic effects around the Earth. The frame dragging effect will cause a small force to push the gyroscope’s spin axis out of alignment, as it orbits the Earth. And the much larger geodetic effect – warping of space–time – will also affect the gyroscope’s spin, but in a direction that is perpendicular to that of the frame dragging; and so the effects can be measured separately.
It seems plausible that large bodies of spinning matter could drag space around. The movement of wisp space around a body would increase its circular curvature on its equatorial plane and flatten the curvature at the poles. These effects are likely to be extremely small around the Earth.

5.8 Conclusion
There have been no major changes to our understanding of gravity for the past 300 years. Newton’s law of gravitation gave scientists great opportunity to develop new ideas. So accurate was his theory that it is still widely used today. Scientists used it to calculate the small error in precession of Mercury’s orbit, and this prompted a search for a better theory. But Newton’s theory has not failed, it has merely been replaced by a theory that gives more accurate results – Einstein’s general theory of relativity.
Wisp theory combines a unique property of matter – zero-state space – with both Newton’s and Einstein’s ideas, to form a new theory of gravity.
I believe that Einstein’s success with gravity arose from his ideas on curved space coupled with relativistic time dilation effects. Wisp theory supports these views, but does not agree that space and time are joined, and so differs fundamentally from Einstein’s theory.
Wisp theory treats gravity as a force, a view held by Newton but not by Einstein. But most important is that the source of gravity is the radial compression force that passes through space by contact with neighbouring wisps. It is not caused by ‘action at a distance’ requiring no medium to transmit it. Einstein believed that the gravity force is fictitious – a consequence of curved space–time.
Wisp theory supports Newton’s views as to the cause of gravity. Although its effects propagate through wisp space at the speed of light – a prediction of Einstein’s general theory of relativity – and not at infinite speed, as Newton had supposed. However, most scientists believe that Newton’s law of gravitation applies to the entire universe. And for slow-moving systems Newton’s theory appears correct. It only begins to suffer when speeds in the system increase and relativistic effects come in to play.
Wisp theory predicts that the rotation of wisp space produces additional gravitational effects. And if reports of Podkletnov’s gravity experiments are true, which I believe they are, then a new era in science is about to begin.



Home -- About Me -- Reasons why Einstein was wrong -- One-way speed of light experiments -- Hot topic -- Q&A -- ACES - The end of Relativity --
Book Contents -- Introduction -- 1 Matter, Space and Time -- 2 Symmetry -- 3 Fractals -- 4 Wisp Space -- 5 Gravity -- 6 Electromagnetic Force --
7 Wisp & S.R: Fundamentals -- 8 Wisp & S.R: Electrodynamics --
9 Wisp & S.R: Doppler effect -- 10 Wisp & S.R: Relativistic Mechanics --
11 Big bang -- Appendix A -- Appendix B -- Index A-Z -- Copyright -- Feedback


Copyright © Kevin Harkess 2002 - 2012. All rights reserved. Harkess Research.